<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo Site Explorer Spider</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/yahoo-site-explorer-spider/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/yahoo-site-explorer-spider/</link>
	<description>Information Security Think Tank</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: pdp</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/yahoo-site-explorer-spider/#comment-115750</link>
		<dc:creator>pdp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 07:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/yahoo-site-explorer-spider#comment-115750</guid>
		<description>it is not possible to construct true AJAX spider. Same Origin Policies apply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is not possible to construct true AJAX spider. Same Origin Policies apply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio Vivaldi</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/yahoo-site-explorer-spider/#comment-115741</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio Vivaldi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/yahoo-site-explorer-spider#comment-115741</guid>
		<description>I only got excited until I read the code.  I need a JS spider that actually HITS the site (not fetches pages from a pre-spidered list of yahoo's).

The Web 2.0 world needs a new JS spider to handle link-checking, perf stats and a host of other things.  AJAX components and DHTML screw every spider that is not based on JS and a DOM.

Where can we go?  Has anyone written a true JS and DOM based spider (like a FF plug in) that actually spiders???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only got excited until I read the code.  I need a JS spider that actually HITS the site (not fetches pages from a pre-spidered list of yahoo&#8217;s).</p>
<p>The Web 2.0 world needs a new JS spider to handle link-checking, perf stats and a host of other things.  AJAX components and DHTML screw every spider that is not based on JS and a DOM.</p>
<p>Where can we go?  Has anyone written a true JS and DOM based spider (like a FF plug in) that actually spiders???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JavaScript XSS Scanner &#124; GNUCITIZEN</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/yahoo-site-explorer-spider/#comment-35662</link>
		<dc:creator>JavaScript XSS Scanner &#124; GNUCITIZEN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 19:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/yahoo-site-explorer-spider#comment-35662</guid>
		<description>[...] which I promised to realize after I publish the Yahoo Site Explorer Spider discussed in detail over here. Before going any further, I must say a few words about the legal side of using this tool. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which I promised to realize after I publish the Yahoo Site Explorer Spider discussed in detail over here. Before going any further, I must say a few words about the legal side of using this tool. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liquidmatrix Security Digest &#187; Yahoo Site Explorer Spider</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/yahoo-site-explorer-spider/#comment-35638</link>
		<dc:creator>Liquidmatrix Security Digest &#187; Yahoo Site Explorer Spider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/yahoo-site-explorer-spider#comment-35638</guid>
		<description>[...] Article Link [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Article Link [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdp</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/yahoo-site-explorer-spider/#comment-35637</link>
		<dc:creator>pdp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/yahoo-site-explorer-spider#comment-35637</guid>
		<description>heh, I am working on another one which allows you to perform XSS scans right from the browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh, I am working on another one which allows you to perform XSS scans right from the browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Pastor</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/yahoo-site-explorer-spider/#comment-35636</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Pastor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/yahoo-site-explorer-spider#comment-35636</guid>
		<description>nice one pdp. I'm really impressed by the speed of the results! Couldn't believe it! damn you, you got me excited about this, even though I have other exciting toys to play with on my todo list :)

Regarding the name I would call it a "passive spider", since it doesn't actually visit the target site, which makes it more ideal from the cracker's perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice one pdp. I&#8217;m really impressed by the speed of the results! Couldn&#8217;t believe it! damn you, you got me excited about this, even though I have other exciting toys to play with on my todo list :)</p>
<p>Regarding the name I would call it a &#8220;passive spider&#8221;, since it doesn&#8217;t actually visit the target site, which makes it more ideal from the cracker&#8217;s perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdp</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/yahoo-site-explorer-spider/#comment-35618</link>
		<dc:creator>pdp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 08:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/yahoo-site-explorer-spider#comment-35618</guid>
		<description>You are right. Although I seriously doubt that Yahoo will craw the pinged website right away, more likely it will schedule it for some latter point, attackers that are interested in particular sites can ping for updates constantly thus ensuring that Yahoo has the latest index.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right. Although I seriously doubt that Yahoo will craw the pinged website right away, more likely it will schedule it for some latter point, attackers that are interested in particular sites can ping for updates constantly thus ensuring that Yahoo has the latest index.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Kierznowski</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/yahoo-site-explorer-spider/#comment-35613</link>
		<dc:creator>David Kierznowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 06:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/yahoo-site-explorer-spider#comment-35613</guid>
		<description>Yahoo calls it "Site Explorer" :) however, its interesting to me that the service supports a ping and update feature, so maybe web spider is just fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo calls it &#8220;Site Explorer&#8221; :) however, its interesting to me that the service supports a ping and update feature, so maybe web spider is just fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdp</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/yahoo-site-explorer-spider/#comment-35611</link>
		<dc:creator>pdp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 06:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/yahoo-site-explorer-spider#comment-35611</guid>
		<description>Interesting question. I am not quite sure, I must say. From my prospective, it is still a spider. However, what name do you think will suit best for a tool like this one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting question. I am not quite sure, I must say. From my prospective, it is still a spider. However, what name do you think will suit best for a tool like this one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Kierznowski</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/yahoo-site-explorer-spider/#comment-35610</link>
		<dc:creator>David Kierznowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 06:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/yahoo-site-explorer-spider#comment-35610</guid>
		<description>Nice proof of concept. I agree, the speed of this spider and the depth option is awesome! Only a technical question, but can we call this a web spider as it doesn't really spider the site but rather fetches pages already indexed by Yahoo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice proof of concept. I agree, the speed of this spider and the depth option is awesome! Only a technical question, but can we call this a web spider as it doesn&#8217;t really spider the site but rather fetches pages already indexed by Yahoo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
