<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Browser Security Restrictions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/on-browser-security-restrictions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/on-browser-security-restrictions/</link>
	<description>Information Security Think Tank</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 17:50:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/on-browser-security-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-45598</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 17:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/on-browser-security-restrictions#comment-45598</guid>
		<description>How about this for a solution to CSRF:
http://getahead.org/blog/joe/2007/08/07/fixing_browser_security_samerefereronly.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about this for a solution to CSRF:<br />
<a href="http://getahead.org/blog/joe/2007/08/07/fixing_browser_security_samerefereronly.html" rel="nofollow">http://getahead.org/blog/joe/2.....ronly.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdp</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/on-browser-security-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-40115</link>
		<dc:creator>pdp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 18:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/on-browser-security-restrictions#comment-40115</guid>
		<description>true, but we need something that is more flexible... something that is user oriented not just suitable for security people like us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>true, but we need something that is more flexible&#8230; something that is user oriented not just suitable for security people like us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giorgio Maone</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/on-browser-security-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-40054</link>
		<dc:creator>Giorgio Maone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 11:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/on-browser-security-restrictions#comment-40054</guid>
		<description>Hi pdp, 
in the end looks like you&#039;re talking about #1 and #3 of the NoScript &quot;Anti-CSRF features in the works&quot;  I told you here last June: http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/xss-worms-and-mitigation-controls#comment-31255

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi pdp,<br />
in the end looks like you&#8217;re talking about #1 and #3 of the NoScript &#8220;Anti-CSRF features in the works&#8221;  I told you here last June: <a href="http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/xss-worms-and-mitigation-controls#comment-31255" rel="nofollow">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog.....ment-31255</a></p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
