<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JavaScript Address Info</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/javascript-address-info/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/javascript-address-info/</link>
	<description>Information Security Think Tank</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 17:50:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Security vs. Accessibility &#124; GNUCITIZEN</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/javascript-address-info/comment-page-1/#comment-130022</link>
		<dc:creator>Security vs. Accessibility &#124; GNUCITIZEN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/javascript-address-info/#comment-130022</guid>
		<description>[...] The problem with the CSS History Hack is that malicious JavaScript code that silently dumps your history is not malicious at all. The code makes use of a feature which has never been designed with security in mind and it effects everything that supports CSS and DOM. Removing this feature will cause a lot of accessibility problems. The same applies to many other malicious techniques that recently have been developed. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The problem with the CSS History Hack is that malicious JavaScript code that silently dumps your history is not malicious at all. The code makes use of a feature which has never been designed with security in mind and it effects everything that supports CSS and DOM. Removing this feature will cause a lot of accessibility problems. The same applies to many other malicious techniques that recently have been developed. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JavaScript Authorization Forcer &#124; GNUCITIZEN</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/javascript-address-info/comment-page-1/#comment-124500</link>
		<dc:creator>JavaScript Authorization Forcer &#124; GNUCITIZEN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 16:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/javascript-address-info/#comment-124500</guid>
		<description>[...] The attacker discovers your internal IP [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The attacker discovers your internal IP [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdp</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/javascript-address-info/comment-page-1/#comment-33360</link>
		<dc:creator>pdp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 10:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/javascript-address-info/#comment-33360</guid>
		<description>right, somehow I missed that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>right, somehow I missed that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/javascript-address-info/comment-page-1/#comment-7917</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 05:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/javascript-address-info/#comment-7917</guid>
		<description>fyi -- when doing some digging, I found this reference to this exact same technique from a while back:

http://www.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/NT-Bugtraq/2003-04/0003.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fyi &#8212; when doing some digging, I found this reference to this exact same technique from a while back:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/NT-Bugtraq/2003-04/0003.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.derkeiler.com/Maili...../0003.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J@Â§Â¤Ã±&#8217;s Stack Trace &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Passive Javascript attacks go Mainstream</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/javascript-address-info/comment-page-1/#comment-4325</link>
		<dc:creator>J@Â§Â¤Ã±&#8217;s Stack Trace &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Passive Javascript attacks go Mainstream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/javascript-address-info/#comment-4325</guid>
		<description>[...] Earlier this month SPI Dynamics released their paper on JavaScript portscanning. Thier port scanner is more capable than what Jeremiah Grossman released. Their paper describes a method for timing onerror events to do port scans, ping sweeps, basic fingerprinting and getting the nat&#8217;d address. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Earlier this month SPI Dynamics released their paper on JavaScript portscanning. Thier port scanner is more capable than what Jeremiah Grossman released. Their paper describes a method for timing onerror events to do port scans, ping sweeps, basic fingerprinting and getting the nat&#8217;d address. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
