<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hacking The Interwebs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs/</link>
	<description>Cutting-edge Think tank &#124; Ethical Hacker Outfit</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: RSA Conference: Web Page Can Take Over Your Router &#171;</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs/#comment-122848</link>
		<dc:creator>RSA Conference: Web Page Can Take Over Your Router &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 23:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs#comment-122848</guid>
		<description>[...] for some time how their default passwords can be misused by attackers. Three months ago, hackers showed how a similar attack could be launched, exploiting a flaw in the way Universal Plug-and-Play works [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for some time how their default passwords can be misused by attackers. Three months ago, hackers showed how a similar attack could be launched, exploiting a flaw in the way Universal Plug-and-Play works [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoffeeAddict &#187; Flash voor al uw hacktivisme&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs/#comment-122823</link>
		<dc:creator>CoffeeAddict &#187; Flash voor al uw hacktivisme&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 09:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs#comment-122823</guid>
		<description>[...] Kwam via via hier terecht. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kwam via via hier terecht. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdp</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs/#comment-122719</link>
		<dc:creator>pdp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 21:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs#comment-122719</guid>
		<description>looks like an interesting read... but I cannot read Spanish, just yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks like an interesting read&#8230; but I cannot read Spanish, just yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josman</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs/#comment-122718</link>
		<dc:creator>josman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 21:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs#comment-122718</guid>
		<description>Hello blog very interesting. This week I found another talk about where things very interesting. Here I leave the address:
http://informaniaticos.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello blog very interesting. This week I found another talk about where things very interesting. Here I leave the address:<br />
<a href="http://informaniaticos.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://informaniaticos.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdp</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs/#comment-122284</link>
		<dc:creator>pdp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 06:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs#comment-122284</guid>
		<description>all you need is a database of endpoints. that's all. you don't even need to fingerprint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all you need is a database of endpoints. that&#8217;s all. you don&#8217;t even need to fingerprint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian 'pagvac' Pastor</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs/#comment-122275</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian 'pagvac' Pastor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 19:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs#comment-122275</guid>
		<description>@nanard: how hard is it to setup a DB of most common UPnP port number/UPnP SOAP URL combinations? 

Home routers can be fingerprinted using JavaScript among other methods, so this attack is trivial to mount once you have a decent database.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@nanard: how hard is it to setup a DB of most common UPnP port number/UPnP SOAP URL combinations? </p>
<p>Home routers can be fingerprinted using JavaScript among other methods, so this attack is trivial to mount once you have a decent database.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nanard</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs/#comment-122270</link>
		<dc:creator>nanard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 16:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs#comment-122270</guid>
		<description>You are right when you say that 99% of the home routers can be found by probin 192.168.0.1, 192.168.0.254, 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.254. But that won't give you neither the port nor the Path for the request. There is NO standard port for UPnP HTTP SOAP. (I'm not talking about SSDP). And different vendors do use differents ports (for example : 2468, 5440, 6688). Also the path is almost always different depending on the router vendor. The Linksys WRT54G (fw v2.02.7) does prefix the URL used with the device UUID. You just cannot guess that ? : /uuid:000625d7-caf9-0006-25d7-caf90232011c/WANPPPConnection:1

linksys rocks :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right when you say that 99% of the home routers can be found by probin 192.168.0.1, 192.168.0.254, 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.254. But that won&#8217;t give you neither the port nor the Path for the request. There is NO standard port for UPnP HTTP SOAP. (I&#8217;m not talking about SSDP). And different vendors do use differents ports (for example : 2468, 5440, 6688). Also the path is almost always different depending on the router vendor. The Linksys WRT54G (fw v2.02.7) does prefix the URL used with the device UUID. You just cannot guess that ? : /uuid:000625d7-caf9-0006-25d7-caf90232011c/WANPPPConnection:1</p>
<p>linksys rocks :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimbo</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs/#comment-119323</link>
		<dc:creator>jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs#comment-119323</guid>
		<description>Sorry but this is nothing new, it was mentioned at the last brumcon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry but this is nothing new, it was mentioned at the last brumcon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Requisiti minimi &#187; Blog Archive &#187; PortMap 1.0</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs/#comment-118876</link>
		<dc:creator>Requisiti minimi &#187; Blog Archive &#187; PortMap 1.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs#comment-118876</guid>
		<description>[...] di questo protocollo, perché se da una parte semplifica la vita, dall&#8217;altra apre la strada a diverse vulnerabilità, soprattutto se nel router viene lasciata la possibilità di accedere da amministratore tramite la [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] di questo protocollo, perché se da una parte semplifica la vita, dall&#8217;altra apre la strada a diverse vulnerabilità, soprattutto se nel router viene lasciata la possibilità di accedere da amministratore tramite la [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inseguridad en UPnP. &#187; Vida Casi Digital</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs/#comment-118651</link>
		<dc:creator>Inseguridad en UPnP. &#187; Vida Casi Digital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs#comment-118651</guid>
		<description>[...] Hacking The Interwebs: http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hacking The Interwebs: <a href="http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs/" rel="nofollow">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog.....interwebs/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B Onward Srl &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Con un sito ti cracco il router</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs/#comment-118547</link>
		<dc:creator>B Onward Srl &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Con un sito ti cracco il router</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 20:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs#comment-118547</guid>
		<description>[...] remota da parte del malintenzionato. Una tattica simile a quella circolata qualche mese fa, diretta verso la funzionalità UPnP, che autorevoli fonti da tempo suggeriscono di [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] remota da parte del malintenzionato. Una tattica simile a quella circolata qualche mese fa, diretta verso la funzionalità UPnP, che autorevoli fonti da tempo suggeriscono di [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Con un sito ti cracco il router &#124; FDS</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs/#comment-118535</link>
		<dc:creator>Con un sito ti cracco il router &#124; FDS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 17:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs#comment-118535</guid>
		<description>[...] tattica simile a quella circolata qualche mese fa, diretta verso la funzionalità UPnP, che autorevoli fonti da tempo suggeriscono di [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tattica simile a quella circolata qualche mese fa, diretta verso la funzionalità UPnP, che autorevoli fonti da tempo suggeriscono di [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Il ReteGiornale&#187; Informatica &#187; Con un sito ti cracco il router</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs/#comment-118468</link>
		<dc:creator>Il ReteGiornale&#187; Informatica &#187; Con un sito ti cracco il router</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 01:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs#comment-118468</guid>
		<description>[...] remota da parte del malintenzionato. Una tattica simile a quella circolata qualche mese fa, diretta verso la funzionalità UPnP, che autorevoli fonti da tempo suggeriscono di [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] remota da parte del malintenzionato. Una tattica simile a quella circolata qualche mese fa, diretta verso la funzionalità UPnP, che autorevoli fonti da tempo suggeriscono di [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web page can take over your router &#124; ::Tech Cry::</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs/#comment-118337</link>
		<dc:creator>Web page can take over your router &#124; ::Tech Cry::</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 02:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs#comment-118337</guid>
		<description>[...] for some time how their default passwords can be misused by attackers. Three months ago, hackers showed how a similar attack could be launched, exploiting a flaw in the way Universal Plug-and-Play works [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for some time how their default passwords can be misused by attackers. Three months ago, hackers showed how a similar attack could be launched, exploiting a flaw in the way Universal Plug-and-Play works [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web page can take over your router &#124; InfoWorld &#124; News &#124; 2008-04-07 &#124; By Robert McMillan, IDG News Service</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs/#comment-118321</link>
		<dc:creator>Web page can take over your router &#124; InfoWorld &#124; News &#124; 2008-04-07 &#124; By Robert McMillan, IDG News Service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 23:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs#comment-118321</guid>
		<description>[...] for some time how their default passwords can be misused by attackers. Three months ago, hackers showed how a similar attack could be launched, exploiting a flaw in the way Universal Plug-and-Play works [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for some time how their default passwords can be misused by attackers. Three months ago, hackers showed how a similar attack could be launched, exploiting a flaw in the way Universal Plug-and-Play works [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdp</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs/#comment-116434</link>
		<dc:creator>pdp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs#comment-116434</guid>
		<description>Ken,

keep also in mind that even if you choose a different IP address from the default one, your router still can be discovered by name. Most of the time it is simply called &lt;strong&gt;home&lt;/strong&gt;. In the case of BT home hub it is know as &lt;strong&gt;api&lt;/strong&gt;. Therefore, request to api or home will result to requests to your router no matter what the IP address is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken,</p>
<p>keep also in mind that even if you choose a different IP address from the default one, your router still can be discovered by name. Most of the time it is simply called <strong>home</strong>. In the case of BT home hub it is know as <strong>api</strong>. Therefore, request to api or home will result to requests to your router no matter what the IP address is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs/#comment-116432</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs#comment-116432</guid>
		<description>@pdp: "Home routers are located on 192.168.0.1, 192.168.1.1, 192.168.0.254 or 192.168.1.254 and this is the case with %99.9 if not %100 of all cases."

Years ago, when I first setup my home router, I chose an IP network range that was different than any of those.  I reasoned it would be more secure if I denied an attacker a default.

But I never really knew of any attack that I was protecting myself from--until now.  Thanks for the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@pdp: &#8220;Home routers are located on 192.168.0.1, 192.168.1.1, 192.168.0.254 or 192.168.1.254 and this is the case with %99.9 if not %100 of all cases.&#8221;</p>
<p>Years ago, when I first setup my home router, I chose an IP network range that was different than any of those.  I reasoned it would be more secure if I denied an attacker a default.</p>
<p>But I never really knew of any attack that I was protecting myself from&#8211;until now.  Thanks for the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdp</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs/#comment-116062</link>
		<dc:creator>pdp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 10:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs#comment-116062</guid>
		<description>if UPnP is enables and it supports interesting methods such as SetDnsServer, etc then it is almost certain that someone can own them. Keep in mind though that some devices show that this method is supported although when used it is evident that it hasn't been implemented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if UPnP is enables and it supports interesting methods such as SetDnsServer, etc then it is almost certain that someone can own them. Keep in mind though that some devices show that this method is supported although when used it is evident that it hasn&#8217;t been implemented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ionstorm</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs/#comment-116058</link>
		<dc:creator>ionstorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 05:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs#comment-116058</guid>
		<description>excellent article, I have something to contribute although I am not familiar with upnp very much but I have found some interesting things with ferret on my lan:
It seems all new 2WIRE Home Gateways have upnp enabled when you enable remote access to admin your router via your web browser, I have found all these files:

http://ubuntu-debs.googlecode.com/files/270HG-D_Gateway_upnp_xml.tar.gz
via: http://qwestcustomer-ip-address/upnp/*

I have reason to believe all these companies customers are effected: http://2wire.com/index.php?p=2

While I was taking a look at these xml files it looks like people can take full control of all these 2WIRE modems which hundreds of thousands of people use, including AT&#38;T/qwest customers.  I may be completely wrong.  With access to xml files with commands to change passwords and modify firewall rulesets like I have found with my own router is scary lol.

Let me know what you think of these files, can someone take full control over these routers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>excellent article, I have something to contribute although I am not familiar with upnp very much but I have found some interesting things with ferret on my lan:<br />
It seems all new 2WIRE Home Gateways have upnp enabled when you enable remote access to admin your router via your web browser, I have found all these files:</p>
<p><a href="http://ubuntu-debs.googlecode.com/files/270HG-D_Gateway_upnp_xml.tar.gz" rel="nofollow">http://ubuntu-debs.googlecode......xml.tar.gz</a><br />
via: <a href="http://qwestcustomer-ip-address/upnp/" rel="nofollow">http://qwestcustomer-ip-address/upnp/</a>*</p>
<p>I have reason to believe all these companies customers are effected: <a href="http://2wire.com/index.php?p=2" rel="nofollow">http://2wire.com/index.php?p=2</a></p>
<p>While I was taking a look at these xml files it looks like people can take full control of all these 2WIRE modems which hundreds of thousands of people use, including AT&amp;T/qwest customers.  I may be completely wrong.  With access to xml files with commands to change passwords and modify firewall rulesets like I have found with my own router is scary lol.</p>
<p>Let me know what you think of these files, can someone take full control over these routers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdp</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs/#comment-115757</link>
		<dc:creator>pdp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs#comment-115757</guid>
		<description>this is very interesting and quite unfortunate. you have to investigate to see what are the damages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is very interesting and quite unfortunate. you have to investigate to see what are the damages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
