<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/google-chrome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/google-chrome/</link>
	<description>Information Security Think Tank</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Traian Neacsu</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/google-chrome/#comment-124359</link>
		<dc:creator>Traian Neacsu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gnucitizen.org/?p=1187#comment-124359</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I am still curious if the launch of Chrome was something "unintentional". I wrote a little piece of article about this, called &lt;a href="http://www.pitstopmedia.com/sem/googles-chrome-coincidence" rel="nofollow"&gt;Google’s Chrome, a coincidence?&lt;/a&gt;.

I also kept a log on &lt;a href="http://www.pitstopmedia.com/sem/google-chrome" rel="nofollow"&gt;how Chrome evolved from search engines point of view&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks,
TraiaN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I am still curious if the launch of Chrome was something &#8220;unintentional&#8221;. I wrote a little piece of article about this, called <a href="http://www.pitstopmedia.com/sem/googles-chrome-coincidence" rel="nofollow">Google’s Chrome, a coincidence?</a>.</p>
<p>I also kept a log on <a href="http://www.pitstopmedia.com/sem/google-chrome" rel="nofollow">how Chrome evolved from search engines point of view</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
TraiaN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marketing Man</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/google-chrome/#comment-124036</link>
		<dc:creator>Marketing Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gnucitizen.org/?p=1187#comment-124036</guid>
		<description>I think the launch of Google Chrome is going to sink firefox in the long run, and it makes it much more painful for web developers because another browser means another platform they'll have to test their websites on. But I actually like Chrome, it's very robust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the launch of Google Chrome is going to sink firefox in the long run, and it makes it much more painful for web developers because another browser means another platform they&#8217;ll have to test their websites on. But I actually like Chrome, it&#8217;s very robust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: led</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/google-chrome/#comment-123944</link>
		<dc:creator>led</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 23:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gnucitizen.org/?p=1187#comment-123944</guid>
		<description>well chrome is a great user experience, as it goes, and it has added tabs which will help a novie user to go back to his pre-page as quikcley as possible</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well chrome is a great user experience, as it goes, and it has added tabs which will help a novie user to go back to his pre-page as quikcley as possible</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/google-chrome/#comment-123901</link>
		<dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gnucitizen.org/?p=1187#comment-123901</guid>
		<description>google chrome is awsom.


weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>google chrome is awsom.</p>
<p>weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucian</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/google-chrome/#comment-123841</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gnucitizen.org/?p=1187#comment-123841</guid>
		<description>All new Google Chrome tricks at 

http&#58;//mygooglechrome.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All new Google Chrome tricks at </p>
<p>http&#58;//mygooglechrome.blogspot.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulusDev</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/google-chrome/#comment-123827</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulusDev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gnucitizen.org/?p=1187#comment-123827</guid>
		<description>If anyone cannot scroll up, I released a program to quickly and automatically fix the "cannot scroll up using certain touch pads" issue for Google Chrome (until Chrome is fixed officially). Just run chrome_patch.exe. It will modify chrome.dll to fix the issue. You can download/read about it at http://digg.com/software/Google_Chrome_68</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone cannot scroll up, I released a program to quickly and automatically fix the &#8220;cannot scroll up using certain touch pads&#8221; issue for Google Chrome (until Chrome is fixed officially). Just run chrome_patch.exe. It will modify chrome.dll to fix the issue. You can download/read about it at <a href="http://digg.com/software/Google_Chrome_68" rel="nofollow">http://digg.com/software/Google_Chrome_68</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/google-chrome/#comment-123788</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gnucitizen.org/?p=1187#comment-123788</guid>
		<description>As a new comer, Chrome is good and its right, I'd tried it by myself. Compare to the others internet browser,Chrome apparently take a high position level. toptenreviews.com had reviewed &#38; done the survey and the result is Chrome take 2nd position between Firefox 3 at 1st &#38; IE 8 at 3rd position</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a new comer, Chrome is good and its right, I&#8217;d tried it by myself. Compare to the others internet browser,Chrome apparently take a high position level. toptenreviews.com had reviewed &amp; done the survey and the result is Chrome take 2nd position between Firefox 3 at 1st &amp; IE 8 at 3rd position</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katy</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/google-chrome/#comment-123734</link>
		<dc:creator>katy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gnucitizen.org/?p=1187#comment-123734</guid>
		<description>A few more words on the speed :we've measured the speed of our aplication (http://www.taskwriter.com) on Google Chrome, and it's just a bit faster than Firefox 3.0 . IE is well behind. The graphs are here : http://www.taskwriter.com/blog/how-good-chrome-really-is</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few more words on the speed :we&#8217;ve measured the speed of our aplication (http://www.taskwriter.com) on Google Chrome, and it&#8217;s just a bit faster than Firefox 3.0 . IE is well behind. The graphs are here : <a href="http://www.taskwriter.com/blog/how-good-chrome-really-is" rel="nofollow">http://www.taskwriter.com/blog.....-really-is</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Improving Google Chrome &#124; GNUCITIZEN</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/google-chrome/#comment-123654</link>
		<dc:creator>Improving Google Chrome &#124; GNUCITIZEN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gnucitizen.org/?p=1187#comment-123654</guid>
		<description>[...] to protect the user from attacks which try to takeover your browser and operating system. As I explained here, because nowadays most of the data is located on the Web, it makes sense to have built-in security [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to protect the user from attacks which try to takeover your browser and operating system. As I explained here, because nowadays most of the data is located on the Web, it makes sense to have built-in security [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Synergy6</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/google-chrome/#comment-123631</link>
		<dc:creator>Synergy6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gnucitizen.org/?p=1187#comment-123631</guid>
		<description>Looks good so far, but a lack of Adblock is an issue. 

Discussion forum at http://wearechrome.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks good so far, but a lack of Adblock is an issue. </p>
<p>Discussion forum at <a href="http://wearechrome.com" rel="nofollow">http://wearechrome.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Chrome Knowledge Base</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/google-chrome/#comment-123623</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Chrome Knowledge Base</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 03:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gnucitizen.org/?p=1187#comment-123623</guid>
		<description>haha I new you wouldn't let us down. I'm working on some stuff myself atm and have had mild success in bypassing a few restrictions imposed by the browser but nothing worthy of a post just yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha I new you wouldn&#8217;t let us down. I&#8217;m working on some stuff myself atm and have had mild success in bypassing a few restrictions imposed by the browser but nothing worthy of a post just yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdp</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/google-chrome/#comment-123606</link>
		<dc:creator>pdp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gnucitizen.org/?p=1187#comment-123606</guid>
		<description>there are vulnerabilities, just we haven't publicly disclosed them just yet. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there are vulnerabilities, just we haven&#8217;t publicly disclosed them just yet. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Chrome Knowledge Base</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/google-chrome/#comment-123599</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Chrome Knowledge Base</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 04:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gnucitizen.org/?p=1187#comment-123599</guid>
		<description>I can't believe how quiet all the browser bug hunters are at the moment. I was positive Ronald would have put something together for us by now or Rsnake would have found a post in something bad about the whole Google influence... but nothing. I guess its just a matter of time before ppl get through with analyzing the source code and bam, we will have a flood of 0days.

Anyways atm, the 1 common theme I'm seeing from the bugs coming out is that there doesn't seem to be enough data validation (i.e.checking string lengths etc) in its routine processing which seems to be cause for most issues. 

Finally, I plan to document all the bugs/spoilts for Chrome as they come out and you can keep up to date on them here - http://chromekb.com/vulnerabilities/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe how quiet all the browser bug hunters are at the moment. I was positive Ronald would have put something together for us by now or Rsnake would have found a post in something bad about the whole Google influence&#8230; but nothing. I guess its just a matter of time before ppl get through with analyzing the source code and bam, we will have a flood of 0days.</p>
<p>Anyways atm, the 1 common theme I&#8217;m seeing from the bugs coming out is that there doesn&#8217;t seem to be enough data validation (i.e.checking string lengths etc) in its routine processing which seems to be cause for most issues. </p>
<p>Finally, I plan to document all the bugs/spoilts for Chrome as they come out and you can keep up to date on them here - <a href="http://chromekb.com/vulnerabilities/" rel="nofollow">http://chromekb.com/vulnerabilities/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NurBo</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/google-chrome/#comment-123557</link>
		<dc:creator>NurBo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 21:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gnucitizen.org/?p=1187#comment-123557</guid>
		<description>The new Google Chrome browser is very nice and is surprising really fast. I can't wait to see the final addition of this browser maybe a darker skin and some new add ons and perhaps a spell check. If so I will be using this browser alot. Keep it up Google!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new Google Chrome browser is very nice and is surprising really fast. I can&#8217;t wait to see the final addition of this browser maybe a darker skin and some new add ons and perhaps a spell check. If so I will be using this browser alot. Keep it up Google!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tikurion.net &#187; What is it with Google Chrome?</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/google-chrome/#comment-123547</link>
		<dc:creator>tikurion.net &#187; What is it with Google Chrome?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gnucitizen.org/?p=1187#comment-123547</guid>
		<description>[...] GNUCITIZEN has a nice article too. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GNUCITIZEN has a nice article too. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chi</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/google-chrome/#comment-123542</link>
		<dc:creator>chi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gnucitizen.org/?p=1187#comment-123542</guid>
		<description>mock of google cartoons.

http://www.surfchrome.com/index.php/gallery/chrometoon-googleville-satire/59-initial-mock-google-cartoons-emerge</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mock of google cartoons.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.surfchrome.com/index.php/gallery/chrometoon-googleville-satire/59-initial-mock-google-cartoons-emerge" rel="nofollow">http://www.surfchrome.com/inde.....ons-emerge</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisbdaemon</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/google-chrome/#comment-123534</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisbdaemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 07:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gnucitizen.org/?p=1187#comment-123534</guid>
		<description>Yes Chrome does sound pretty good, however I'd recommend checking out this blog post as well as it points out some of the defects (granted it is beta but some of their points are valid imo)

http://blog.ncircle.com/blogs/vert/archives/2008/09/the_browser_with_bling.html

Also make sure to pay attention to the snippet of the EULA statement quoted in the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Chrome does sound pretty good, however I&#8217;d recommend checking out this blog post as well as it points out some of the defects (granted it is beta but some of their points are valid imo)</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.ncircle.com/blogs/vert/archives/2008/09/the_browser_with_bling.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.ncircle.com/blogs/.....bling.html</a></p>
<p>Also make sure to pay attention to the snippet of the EULA statement quoted in the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brandon miles</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/google-chrome/#comment-123526</link>
		<dc:creator>brandon miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gnucitizen.org/?p=1187#comment-123526</guid>
		<description>Google Chrome has 2 very very important security holes. Which can let some bad webmasters upload exe files to your computers without your prompt !! Go ahead and continue loving Google Chrome. When your computer suddenly shuts down and when you realize all your data is gone dont blame anybody but Google Chrome..

go and read http://www.computersake.com/2008/09/google-chrome-security-hole/ and be aware of that kind of security issues !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Chrome has 2 very very important security holes. Which can let some bad webmasters upload exe files to your computers without your prompt !! Go ahead and continue loving Google Chrome. When your computer suddenly shuts down and when you realize all your data is gone dont blame anybody but Google Chrome..</p>
<p>go and read <a href="http://www.computersake.com/2008/09/google-chrome-security-hole/" rel="nofollow">http://www.computersake.com/20.....rity-hole/</a> and be aware of that kind of security issues !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chromed at aleatory</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/google-chrome/#comment-123523</link>
		<dc:creator>Chromed at aleatory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gnucitizen.org/?p=1187#comment-123523</guid>
		<description>[...] arrived late last night to the news that Google has entered the browser wars.  First impressions for me - something needs to be done about the slowdown/freezing that js-heavy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] arrived late last night to the news that Google has entered the browser wars.  First impressions for me - something needs to be done about the slowdown/freezing that js-heavy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Star Ruby Shop</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/google-chrome/#comment-123522</link>
		<dc:creator>The Star Ruby Shop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gnucitizen.org/?p=1187#comment-123522</guid>
		<description>Really.. Google is getting everywhere!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really.. Google is getting everywhere!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
