<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BT Home Flub: Pwnin the BT Home Hub (5) &#8211; exploiting IGDs remotely via UPnP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5/</link>
	<description>Information Security Think Tank</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:56:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ocean</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5/comment-page-1/#comment-126525</link>
		<dc:creator>ocean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5#comment-126525</guid>
		<description>great post. hey anybody know how to exploit NAT in router. Port forwarding is also best way to exploit router</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great post. hey anybody know how to exploit NAT in router. Port forwarding is also best way to exploit router</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CERT Polska &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Urz?dzenia korzystaj?ce z UPnP s? podatne na ataki</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5/comment-page-1/#comment-123999</link>
		<dc:creator>CERT Polska &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Urz?dzenia korzystaj?ce z UPnP s? podatne na ataki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5#comment-123999</guid>
		<description>[...]  www.gnucitizen.org (opis problemu) isc.sans.org www.gnu citixen.org [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  <a href="http://www.gnucitizen.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.gnucitizen.org</a> (opis problemu) isc.sans.org <a href="http://www.gnu" rel="nofollow">http://www.gnu</a> citixen.org [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian 'pagvac' Pastor</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5/comment-page-1/#comment-123130</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian 'pagvac' Pastor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5#comment-123130</guid>
		<description>@anonymous: that question is NOT dumb at all! The only reason why it&#039;s possible to contact an internal system (home router in this case) is because:

1. you visit evil.com which loads HTML/JS code in your browser
2. your browser executes such code
3. since your browser is located in the *internal* network (LAN), it CAN communicate with your home router, even if the HTTP service is only available internally

In other words: your browser becomes your worst enemy. It&#039;s nothing else than a proxy which links both the external world (WAN/Internet) and the internal one (LAN/intranet).

Makes sense? Let me know if you have any other questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@anonymous: that question is NOT dumb at all! The only reason why it&#8217;s possible to contact an internal system (home router in this case) is because:</p>
<p>1. you visit evil.com which loads HTML/JS code in your browser<br />
2. your browser executes such code<br />
3. since your browser is located in the *internal* network (LAN), it CAN communicate with your home router, even if the HTTP service is only available internally</p>
<p>In other words: your browser becomes your worst enemy. It&#8217;s nothing else than a proxy which links both the external world (WAN/Internet) and the internal one (LAN/intranet).</p>
<p>Makes sense? Let me know if you have any other questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5/comment-page-1/#comment-123118</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5#comment-123118</guid>
		<description>Hi,

This must sound really dumb to you guys but I have to ask it .. how are you allowed to make a request to 192.*.* if you are from some evil.com site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>This must sound really dumb to you guys but I have to ask it .. how are you allowed to make a request to 192.*.* if you are from some evil.com site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holes in Embedded Devices: Authentication bypass (pt 2) &#187; Inking&#8217;s Security Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5/comment-page-1/#comment-114869</link>
		<dc:creator>Holes in Embedded Devices: Authentication bypass (pt 2) &#187; Inking&#8217;s Security Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 02:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5#comment-114869</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs" rel="nofollow">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog.....-interwebs</a> <a href="http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5" rel="nofollow">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog.....home-hub-5</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catweazle</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5/comment-page-1/#comment-101091</link>
		<dc:creator>catweazle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5#comment-101091</guid>
		<description>DUH! Am so confused reading all the above have answered my own question! Of course this will happen! Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DUH! Am so confused reading all the above have answered my own question! Of course this will happen! Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catweazle</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5/comment-page-1/#comment-101089</link>
		<dc:creator>catweazle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5#comment-101089</guid>
		<description>gool: I run an Alcatel Speedtouch 510 (4.3.2.6.0 firmware; 9 volt supply version)router and set it to disable UPnP, turned firewall on to standard level and when I retrieve your link it opens the 510 Connectivity Check menu window.

This is quite scary as I thought UPnP was blocked by the 510. What &#039;should&#039; your link do? (Using Mac OS Leopard)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gool: I run an Alcatel Speedtouch 510 (4.3.2.6.0 firmware; 9 volt supply version)router and set it to disable UPnP, turned firewall on to standard level and when I retrieve your link it opens the 510 Connectivity Check menu window.</p>
<p>This is quite scary as I thought UPnP was blocked by the 510. What &#8216;should&#8217; your link do? (Using Mac OS Leopard)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdp</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5/comment-page-1/#comment-100323</link>
		<dc:creator>pdp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5#comment-100323</guid>
		<description>gool, the UPnP attack does work on the latest firmware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gool, the UPnP attack does work on the latest firmware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gool</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5/comment-page-1/#comment-100313</link>
		<dc:creator>gool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5#comment-100313</guid>
		<description>i found that u can get straight to menu in last firmware without serial chk but it will ask for user and password

http://192.168.1.254/cgi/b/connchk/?ce=1&amp;be=0&amp;l0=4&amp;l1=-1

hope can find bug in laste firmware, UPnP attack dosent work on last firmware E</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i found that u can get straight to menu in last firmware without serial chk but it will ask for user and password</p>
<p><a href="http://192.168.1.254/cgi/b/connchk/?ce=1&#038;be=0&#038;l0=4&#038;l1=-1" rel="nofollow">http://192.168.1.254/cgi/b/con.....#038;l1=-1</a></p>
<p>hope can find bug in laste firmware, UPnP attack dosent work on last firmware E</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BT Home Hub Vulnerable - Security exploits - PoC &#171; Another rambling&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5/comment-page-1/#comment-99804</link>
		<dc:creator>BT Home Hub Vulnerable - Security exploits - PoC &#171; Another rambling&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5#comment-99804</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5" rel="nofollow">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog.....home-hub-5</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Pastor</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5/comment-page-1/#comment-98674</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Pastor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 00:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5#comment-98674</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark. I&#039;m a bit confused about your comment. Changing passwords shouldn&#039;t make a difference on this exploit as the payload uses a UPnP which is a authentication-less protocol (no password required!).

Please elaborate so I can understand your problem better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark. I&#8217;m a bit confused about your comment. Changing passwords shouldn&#8217;t make a difference on this exploit as the payload uses a UPnP which is a authentication-less protocol (no password required!).</p>
<p>Please elaborate so I can understand your problem better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdp</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5/comment-page-1/#comment-98570</link>
		<dc:creator>pdp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5#comment-98570</guid>
		<description>10x for the info. through, I am not sure whether it is me, but how is that related to the hack discussed above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10x for the info. through, I am not sure whether it is me, but how is that related to the hack discussed above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5/comment-page-1/#comment-98569</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5#comment-98569</guid>
		<description>Bt have kindly updated HH to version E, if you changed your password from the default (please!) the exploit now just goes into a loop with no changes made. AFAIK the HH now requires a serial number input in order to change the pass also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bt have kindly updated HH to version E, if you changed your password from the default (please!) the exploit now just goes into a loop with no changes made. AFAIK the HH now requires a serial number input in order to change the pass also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rezn</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5/comment-page-1/#comment-98540</link>
		<dc:creator>rezn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5#comment-98540</guid>
		<description>UPNP requests executed via DNS Rebinding sounds like a really ugly thing.  One that wouldn&#039;t be difficult to code up into a convenient little applet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPNP requests executed via DNS Rebinding sounds like a really ugly thing.  One that wouldn&#8217;t be difficult to code up into a convenient little applet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steal His Wi-Fi &#124; GNUCITIZEN</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5/comment-page-1/#comment-98382</link>
		<dc:creator>Steal His Wi-Fi &#124; GNUCITIZEN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5#comment-98382</guid>
		<description>[...] think about it: who gives a darn about compromising your computer when you can change the DNS settings on most consumer routers without a password via UPnP? We&#8217;ve said it before here at GNUCITIZEN: people are stuck on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] think about it: who gives a darn about compromising your computer when you can change the DNS settings on most consumer routers without a password via UPnP? We&#8217;ve said it before here at GNUCITIZEN: people are stuck on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Pastor</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5/comment-page-1/#comment-98226</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Pastor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5#comment-98226</guid>
		<description>Something that worries me about many network devices that support UPnP is that when you change settings via UPnP they sometimes cannot be undone via the web console! Instead you need to undo them via UPnP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something that worries me about many network devices that support UPnP is that when you change settings via UPnP they sometimes cannot be undone via the web console! Instead you need to undo them via UPnP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hacking with UPnP (Universal Plug and Play) &#124; GNUCITIZEN</title>
		<link>http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5/comment-page-1/#comment-98007</link>
		<dc:creator>Hacking with UPnP (Universal Plug and Play) &#124; GNUCITIZEN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/bt-home-flub-pwnin-the-bt-home-hub-5#comment-98007</guid>
		<description>[...] We simply expose how UPnP works and how it can be attacked. Though, Adrian has a very interesting research coming up which I think will make you flip out. HE SHOWS HOW TO EXPLOIT UPNP REMOTELY EVEN WHEN NO [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We simply expose how UPnP works and how it can be attacked. Though, Adrian has a very interesting research coming up which I think will make you flip out. HE SHOWS HOW TO EXPLOIT UPNP REMOTELY EVEN WHEN NO [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

