Comments on: Automated Web Foo or Fud! http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/automated-web-foo-or-fud/ Information Security Think Tank Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:49:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: David Kierznowski http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/automated-web-foo-or-fud/comment-page-1/#comment-38854 David Kierznowski Sat, 04 Aug 2007 09:56:53 +0000 http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/automated-web-foo-or-fud#comment-38854 mario, yes there is. The feature hasn't been implemented into v1 though. mario, yes there is. The feature hasn’t been implemented into v1 though.

]]> By: .mario http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/automated-web-foo-or-fud/comment-page-1/#comment-38770 .mario Fri, 03 Aug 2007 22:53:00 +0000 http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/automated-web-foo-or-fud#comment-38770 <blockquote>JavaScript can be a nightmare to parse, and actually next to impossible in some cases. If you have an AJAX application, you don’t want an automated tool.</blockquote> Yes, yes, yes and yes. Automatic scanning can never substitute manual audit. Is there a way for Technika to log the XHR and fuzz it afterwards?

JavaScript can be a nightmare to parse, and actually next to impossible in some cases. If you have an AJAX application, you don’t want an automated tool.

Yes, yes, yes and yes. Automatic scanning can never substitute manual audit.

Is there a way for Technika to log the XHR and fuzz it afterwards?

]]>