Comments on: Attack of the URL Vulnerabilities http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/attack-of-the-url-vulnerabilities/ Information Security Think Tank Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:49:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: pdp http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/attack-of-the-url-vulnerabilities/comment-page-1/#comment-37116 pdp Thu, 26 Jul 2007 06:43:25 +0000 http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/attack-of-the-url-vulnerabilities#comment-37116 Jordan, thanks for the good research. yes, it is very interesting. Have you taken snapshots of the registry tree for each setup? because now we can detect what's the cause of it. I have some very wild guess but it is good to have some proof. cheers Jordan, thanks for the good research. yes, it is very interesting. Have you taken snapshots of the registry tree for each setup? because now we can detect what’s the cause of it. I have some very wild guess but it is good to have some proof. cheers

]]> By: Jordan http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/attack-of-the-url-vulnerabilities/comment-page-1/#comment-37087 Jordan Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:31:19 +0000 http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/attack-of-the-url-vulnerabilities#comment-37087 Looks like I'm not the only person to observe that: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389580#c6 Looks like I’m not the only person to observe that:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389580#c6

]]> By: Jordan http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/attack-of-the-url-vulnerabilities/comment-page-1/#comment-37074 Jordan Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:02:18 +0000 http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/attack-of-the-url-vulnerabilities#comment-37074 pdp -- I realize that, but there's something else going on. Check this out to see what I mean: XPSP2 with no patches + Firefox = Exploit fails XPSP2 with all patches (sans IE7) + Firefox = Exploit fails XPSP2 with all patches (including IE7) + Firefox = Exploit succeeds! XPSP2 with no patches + Firefox + Thunderbird installed and configured = Exploit fails XPSP2 with no patches except for IE7 + Firefox + Thunderbird = Exploit succeeds! I've tried other combinations besides those, and the only way I can get the exploit to succeed is if IE7 is installed. If anyone's able to get the exploit working without IE7 installed, I'd be really curious to know. pdp — I realize that, but there’s something else going on. Check this out to see what I mean:

XPSP2 with no patches + Firefox = Exploit fails
XPSP2 with all patches (sans IE7) + Firefox = Exploit fails
XPSP2 with all patches (including IE7) + Firefox = Exploit succeeds!
XPSP2 with no patches + Firefox + Thunderbird installed and configured = Exploit fails
XPSP2 with no patches except for IE7 + Firefox + Thunderbird = Exploit succeeds!

I’ve tried other combinations besides those, and the only way I can get the exploit to succeed is if IE7 is installed. If anyone’s able to get the exploit working without IE7 installed, I’d be really curious to know.

]]> By: pdp http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/attack-of-the-url-vulnerabilities/comment-page-1/#comment-37048 pdp Wed, 25 Jul 2007 20:38:34 +0000 http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/attack-of-the-url-vulnerabilities#comment-37048 Jordan, again, it depends on the URL handler for the <strong>mailto:</strong> protocol. Adrian, yes, yes and yes. Jordan, again, it depends on the URL handler for the mailto: protocol.

Adrian, yes, yes and yes.

]]> By: Adrian Pastor http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/attack-of-the-url-vulnerabilities/comment-page-1/#comment-37040 Adrian Pastor Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:28:50 +0000 http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/attack-of-the-url-vulnerabilities#comment-37040 It's very worrying how easy it is to exploit this vulnerability and how well it works. I must research these URI handler bugs! It’s very worrying how easy it is to exploit this vulnerability and how well it works.

I must research these URI handler bugs!

]]> By: Jordan http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/attack-of-the-url-vulnerabilities/comment-page-1/#comment-37038 Jordan Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:26:11 +0000 http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/attack-of-the-url-vulnerabilities#comment-37038 Ok, just ran it a second time after reverting the snapshot, and sure enough -- a base SP2 machine is /not/ vulnerable for some reason. Got the regmon logs, but I don't have the time to parse through them right now. Here's a zip with a screenshot showing the exploit fail, regmon logs of the exploit both failing and then succeeding on the same machine just with and without patches: http://www.psifertex.com/download/firefox-command-injection.zip Maybe someone else can figure it out while I get back to pretending to work on this other project here at my office. ;-) Ok, just ran it a second time after reverting the snapshot, and sure enough — a base SP2 machine is /not/ vulnerable for some reason. Got the regmon logs, but I don’t have the time to parse through them right now.

Here’s a zip with a screenshot showing the exploit fail, regmon logs of the exploit both failing and then succeeding on the same machine just with and without patches:

http://www.psifertex.com/downl.....ection.zip

Maybe someone else can figure it out while I get back to pretending to work on this other project here at my office. ;-)

]]> By: Jordan http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/attack-of-the-url-vulnerabilities/comment-page-1/#comment-37036 Jordan Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:00:42 +0000 http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/attack-of-the-url-vulnerabilities#comment-37036 pdp -- there's something else involved in the process that's disrupting it. I just grabbed all the updates for the SP2 machine, and /now/ the exploit works. Outlook Express is still registered as the mailto handler just like it was before I grabbed the updates. So in short, install a standard SP2 machine. Exploit fails. Install latest security patches. Exploit succeeds. Lemme verify it again and use regmon to trace the registry calls to see if I can find out what's different. pdp — there’s something else involved in the process that’s disrupting it.

I just grabbed all the updates for the SP2 machine, and /now/ the exploit works. Outlook Express is still registered as the mailto handler just like it was before I grabbed the updates.

So in short, install a standard SP2 machine. Exploit fails. Install latest security patches. Exploit succeeds.

Lemme verify it again and use regmon to trace the registry calls to see if I can find out what’s different.

]]> By: pdp http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/attack-of-the-url-vulnerabilities/comment-page-1/#comment-37032 pdp Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:48:50 +0000 http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/attack-of-the-url-vulnerabilities#comment-37032 Jordan, the vector does not work if you have Outlook as a default <strong>mailto:</strong> handler. If your default Mail client is Thunderbird, then you shouldn't have any problem with launching the attack. BTW, try using other protocols. It works like a charm. Jordan, the vector does not work if you have Outlook as a default mailto: handler. If your default Mail client is Thunderbird, then you shouldn’t have any problem with launching the attack. BTW, try using other protocols. It works like a charm.

]]> By: Jordan http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/attack-of-the-url-vulnerabilities/comment-page-1/#comment-37031 Jordan Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:39:39 +0000 http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/attack-of-the-url-vulnerabilities#comment-37031 Odd -- I've been trying to test this in a base XP image, with no luck. Does it really require SP2 to work? That'd be kind of ironic. Outlook Express is the default registered mail handler for mailto: on the test system I just installed into vmware. I'm going through the upgrades now, testing it at each step to see at what point it becomes vulnerable. Odd — I’ve been trying to test this in a base XP image, with no luck. Does it really require SP2 to work? That’d be kind of ironic. Outlook Express is the default registered mail handler for mailto: on the test system I just installed into vmware. I’m going through the upgrades now, testing it at each step to see at what point it becomes vulnerable.

]]> By: Larholm.com - Me, myself and I » Handling URL protocol handlers http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/attack-of-the-url-vulnerabilities/comment-page-1/#comment-37024 Larholm.com - Me, myself and I » Handling URL protocol handlers Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:01:57 +0000 http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/attack-of-the-url-vulnerabilities#comment-37024 [...] Jesper Johanson has expressed his thoughts, as has David LeBlanc, Billy Rios, Window Snyder and pdp. Billy Rios just detailed yet another potential attack vector for protocol [...] [...] Jesper Johanson has expressed his thoughts, as has David LeBlanc, Billy Rios, Window Snyder and pdp. Billy Rios just detailed yet another potential attack vector for protocol [...]

]]> By: pdp http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/attack-of-the-url-vulnerabilities/comment-page-1/#comment-36997 pdp Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:08:24 +0000 http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/attack-of-the-url-vulnerabilities#comment-36997 good, cuz I am not saying anything either :) good, cuz I am not saying anything either :)

]]> By: Giorgio Maone http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/attack-of-the-url-vulnerabilities/comment-page-1/#comment-36996 Giorgio Maone Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:07:11 +0000 http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/attack-of-the-url-vulnerabilities#comment-36996 I'm won't say anything ;) http://noscript.net/changelog#1.1.6.07 I’m won’t say anything ;)
http://noscript.net/changelog#1.1.6.07

]]>